<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Radical Notes &#187; Rahul Choudhary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://radicalnotes.com/journal/author/rahul/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://radicalnotes.com/journal</link>
	<description>Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 04:05:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>More exclusions from the FRA</title>
		<link>http://radicalnotes.com/journal/2011/05/02/more-exclusions-from-the-fra/</link>
		<comments>http://radicalnotes.com/journal/2011/05/02/more-exclusions-from-the-fra/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 03:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rahul Choudhary</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Displacement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radicalnotes.com/journal/?p=2399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the most significant aspects of any right-giving legislation is the institution of layers of filters by which newer forms of segmentation and identities among &#8220;citizens&#8221; are created &#8211; a whole series of the included and excluded is generated every time a new law is legislated. If statutory laws are insufficient in this regard, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://radicalnotes.com/journal/2011/05/02/more-exclusions-from-the-fra/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SC on Custodial Crimes and Preventive Detention</title>
		<link>http://radicalnotes.com/journal/2011/04/24/sc-on-custodial-crimes-and-preventive-detention/</link>
		<comments>http://radicalnotes.com/journal/2011/04/24/sc-on-custodial-crimes-and-preventive-detention/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 12:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rahul Choudhary</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radicalnotes.com/journal/?p=2381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mehoob Batcha &#038; Ors. Vs State Rep. by Supdt of Police (Criminal Appeal No 1511 of 2003) Delivered on March 29, 2011. Rekha vs. State of Tamil Nadu &#038; Anr (Criminal Appeal No. 755 of 2011) Delivered on April 05, 2011 “all three powers are&#8230; organs of political hegemony, but in different degrees: 1. Legislature; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://radicalnotes.com/journal/2011/04/24/sc-on-custodial-crimes-and-preventive-detention/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court on the Urgency Clause in the Land Acquisition Act</title>
		<link>http://radicalnotes.com/journal/2011/03/09/supreme-court-on-the-urgency-clause-in-the-land-acquisition-act/</link>
		<comments>http://radicalnotes.com/journal/2011/03/09/supreme-court-on-the-urgency-clause-in-the-land-acquisition-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 15:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rahul Choudhary</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radicalnotes.com/journal/?p=2309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The contention that the Land Acquisition Act is an expropriatory legislation is reaffirmed by the Supreme Court in a recent judgment (SLP(C) No. 10993 of 2010 Dev Sharan &#038; Ors vs. State of U.P &#038; Ors). The Court was dealing with the issue of invoking of the urgency clause provided under section 17 of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://radicalnotes.com/journal/2011/03/09/supreme-court-on-the-urgency-clause-in-the-land-acquisition-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On the issue of contempt</title>
		<link>http://radicalnotes.com/journal/2009/12/24/on-the-issue-of-contempt/</link>
		<comments>http://radicalnotes.com/journal/2009/12/24/on-the-issue-of-contempt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 10:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rahul Choudhary</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radicalnotes.com/journal/?p=1177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent judgement of the Supreme Court, the three Judges bench agreed to the summary procedure for imposition of punishment in the contempt case. In the case, Leila David vs. State of Maharashtra, filed before the Supreme Court, the petitioner among other reliefs, had also asked for direction to initiate criminal proceedings and strongest [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://radicalnotes.com/journal/2009/12/24/on-the-issue-of-contempt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The High Court orders meaningful public hearings</title>
		<link>http://radicalnotes.com/journal/2009/12/02/the-high-court-orders-meaningful-public-hearings/</link>
		<comments>http://radicalnotes.com/journal/2009/12/02/the-high-court-orders-meaningful-public-hearings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 04:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rahul Choudhary</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radicalnotes.com/journal/?p=865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whenever any project is envisaged and approved, the local affected persons’ consent is the least concern for the authorities. The formal process of public participation in the decision making process comes only at the time of public hearing as provided in the Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification 2006. As per the notification, thirty days notice [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://radicalnotes.com/journal/2009/12/02/the-high-court-orders-meaningful-public-hearings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Singhitarai Project: NEAA creates history</title>
		<link>http://radicalnotes.com/journal/2009/11/30/singhitarai-project-neaa-creates-history/</link>
		<comments>http://radicalnotes.com/journal/2009/11/30/singhitarai-project-neaa-creates-history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rahul Choudhary</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Displacement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radicalnotes.com/journal/?p=839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When the National Environment Appellate Authority (NEAA) has dismissed all the cases (except one in the Polavaram dam case in 2007) filed before it in past 13 years, one cannot expect anything when you approach it but another dismissal. The NEAA is the sole statutory body to challenge the environmental clearances granted to the projects [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://radicalnotes.com/journal/2009/11/30/singhitarai-project-neaa-creates-history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Public Hearing at Munsiyari, Uttarakhand</title>
		<link>http://radicalnotes.com/journal/2008/06/16/munsiyari/</link>
		<comments>http://radicalnotes.com/journal/2008/06/16/munsiyari/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 06:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rahul Choudhary</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Displacement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radicalnotes.com/journal/2008/06/16/munsiyari/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently held Public Hearing for Rupsiabagar – Khasiabara Hydro Electric Project at Munsiyari District of Uttarakhand is an example of the establishment and corporate playing farce with the provisions of public hearing provided in the Environment Impact Assessment Notification, 2006 (EIA Notification). The EIA Notification provides for conducting Public Hearing in the project-affected areas for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://radicalnotes.com/journal/2008/06/16/munsiyari/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Environmental Clearance, a farce played by MoEF-The Vedanta Case</title>
		<link>http://radicalnotes.com/journal/2007/09/24/the-vedanta-case/</link>
		<comments>http://radicalnotes.com/journal/2007/09/24/the-vedanta-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 19:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rahul Choudhary</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Displacement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radicalnotes.com/journal/2007/09/24/the-vedanta-case/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whether it is the Samata ((1997)8SCC19) case, Kudramukh case or more recently the Vedanta Mining case in Orissa, mining is always in disputes and creates a tremendous conflict of interest. For government and the mining company it is always a lucrative enterprise, but for environmentalist, tribal and other affected by mining, it is a disaster. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://radicalnotes.com/journal/2007/09/24/the-vedanta-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

